SC-04-08 Richard Cabot posted an update in the group SC-04-08 3 weeks ago No folders found. Please create and select folder. Documents Folder Title Following special characters are not supported: \ / ? % * : | " < > Privacy Public All Members My Connections Only Me Cancel Create 000341.html 3 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE pre { white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */ } [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards standards at aes.org Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Dear SC-04-08, I have received a liaison letter from SMPTE requesting comments on two draft documents following the earlier comments on B-chain measurement under project AES-X215. I have posted the letter and the draft documents to a folder called, "x215-161222-smpte-liaison-docs" in the SC-04-08 document site. The draft documents are: TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1-Baseline-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-1 Cinema Sound System Baseline Setup and Calibration " TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-2-Maintenance-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-2 Cinema Sound System Recurring/Maintenance Setup and Calibration" A direct login is available at: https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91 Please take a moment to download and consider these documents. Note that the covering letter requests comments by January 20th. Sincerely, Mark Yonge AES Standards Manager standards at aes.org tel: +44 1594 517200 skype: markyonge Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the SC-04-08 mailing list Expand 000342.html 5 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE pre { white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */ } [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes charlie at excelsior-audio.com Tue Dec 27 08:19:02 EST 2016 Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hi Mark, I have some comments on the "Baseline Calibration" document. I haven't yet reviewed the "Maintenance Calibration" document. Should my comments be submitted directly to SMPTE and Alan or should they go to AES first? Just want to know what the proper channel is for comment. Best regards, Charlie Hughes Excelsior Audio Gastonia, NC +1 704.675.5435 (tel) +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) www.excelsior-audio.com -----Original Message----- From: SC-04-08 [mailto:sc-04-08-bounces at standards.aes.org] On Behalf Of AES Standards via SC-04-08 Sent: Friday, 23 December, 2016 6:52 AM To: sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org Cc: AES Standards Subject: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Dear SC-04-08, I have received a liaison letter from SMPTE requesting comments on two draft documents following the earlier comments on B-chain measurement under project AES-X215. I have posted the letter and the draft documents to a folder called, "x215-161222-smpte-liaison-docs" in the SC-04-08 document site. The draft documents are: TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1-Baseline-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-1 Cinema Sound System Baseline Setup and Calibration " TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-2-Maintenance-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-2 Cinema Sound System Recurring/Maintenance Setup and Calibration" A direct login is available at: https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91 Please take a moment to download and consider these documents. Note that the covering letter requests comments by January 20th. Sincerely, Mark Yonge AES Standards Manager standards at aes.org tel: +44 1594 517200 skype: markyonge _______________________________________________ SC-04-08 mailing list SC-04-08 at standards.aes.org <http://standards.aes.org/sc.cfm?ID=91> Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the SC-04-08 mailing list Expand 000343.html 6 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE pre { white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */ } [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards standards at aes.org Wed Dec 28 06:15:44 EST 2016 Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Charlie, Please post your comments to this reflector to allow discussion within this group. A summary can then be sent to SMPTE through our liaison arrangement. best regards, Mark > On 2016-12-27, at 13:19, Charlie Hughes via SC-04-08 <sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > I have some comments on the "Baseline Calibration" document. I haven't yet reviewed the "Maintenance Calibration" document. > > Should my comments be submitted directly to SMPTE and Alan or should they go to AES first? Just want to know what the proper channel is for comment. > > Best regards, > > Charlie Hughes > Excelsior Audio > Gastonia, NC > +1 704.675.5435 (tel) > +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) > www.excelsior-audio.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SC-04-08 [mailto:sc-04-08-bounces at standards.aes.org] On Behalf Of AES Standards via SC-04-08 > Sent: Friday, 23 December, 2016 6:52 AM > To: sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org > Cc: AES Standards > Subject: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE > > Dear SC-04-08, > > I have received a liaison letter from SMPTE requesting comments on two draft documents following the earlier comments on B-chain measurement under project AES-X215. I have posted the letter and the draft documents to a folder called, "x215-161222-smpte-liaison-docs" in the SC-04-08 document site. > > The draft documents are: > > TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1-Baseline-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-1 Cinema Sound System Baseline Setup and Calibration " > > TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-2-Maintenance-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-2 Cinema Sound System Recurring/Maintenance Setup and Calibration" > > A direct login is available at: https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91 > > Please take a moment to download and consider these documents. Note that the covering letter requests comments by January 20th. > > Sincerely, > > > Mark Yonge > AES Standards Manager > > standards at aes.org > tel: +44 1594 517200 > skype: markyonge > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SC-04-08 mailing list > SC-04-08 at standards.aes.org > <http://standards.aes.org/sc.cfm?ID=91> > _______________________________________________ > SC-04-08 mailing list > SC-04-08 at standards.aes.org > <http://standards.aes.org/sc.cfm?ID=91> Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the SC-04-08 mailing list Expand 000344.html 9 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE pre { white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */ } [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes charlie at excelsior-audio.com Wed Dec 28 19:59:36 EST 2016 Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The "Baseline" document with my comments has been uploaded to the SC-04-08 document site. The file name is "x215-TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1CH.pdf". https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91&file=%2Fx215%2DTC25CSS%2DWD%2DRP%2D2096%2D1CH%2Epdf&filesize=5917704 In summary: Page 9 Why are only mics with 1/4" diaphragms to be use? Aren't 1/2" mics suitable? Page 11 It seems that the FFT block size & the sample rate of an analyzer are thought to be the same thing. They are distinctly different Pages 12, 13, & 31 The use of "rd" or "th" immediately after a fraction (e.g. 1/3rd) is redundant and should be avoided. It would be equivalent to writing "one-thirdrd". Page 20 When setting the level of a test signal in comparison to the level of the background noise it is best to consider the frequency dependent nature of the noise and not just the broad band level of the noise. Why are only 1/2" mics mentioned for improved noise survey? One inch mics should perform better than 1/2" mics. Page 21 Using the word "preferred" when referencing NC might be confusing. Someone might think that the preferred noise criteria (PNC) is the metric to be used instead of the noise criteria (NC). Is setting all level controls to unity gain really what is intended? Page 25 Using the phase "opposite side of the scale" to describe a polarity difference seems to not be very rigorous. The setup of the display may not lend itself to have this phase carry much meaning. Page 28 Why is data allowed to be discarded because it doesn't match another measurement? Why is a 20 second average required? Is this due to potential S/N issues? Page 31 There is no Table 2.16.a The broad band SPL (both A-weighted & C-weighted) given in Table 1.13.a are a bit confusing. Are these supposed to be the summed SPL for the 1/3 octave center frequencies from 500 Hz to 2 kHz, inclusive, given an SPL of 71.5 dB in each band? If so, these values do not correlate with each other. Best regards, Charlie Hughes Excelsior Audio Gastonia, NC +1 704.675.5435 (tel) +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) www.excelsior-audio.com -----Original Message----- From: AES Standards [mailto:standards at aes.org] Sent: Wednesday, 28 December, 2016 6:16 AM To: Charlie Hughes; Working group on Measurement and equalization of sound systems in rooms Cc: AES Standards Subject: Re: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie, Please post your comments to this reflector to allow discussion within this group. A summary can then be sent to SMPTE through our liaison arrangement. best regards, Mark > On 2016-12-27, at 13:19, Charlie Hughes via SC-04-08 <sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > I have some comments on the "Baseline Calibration" document. I haven't yet reviewed the "Maintenance Calibration" document. > > Should my comments be submitted directly to SMPTE and Alan or should they go to AES first? Just want to know what the proper channel is for comment. > > Best regards, > > Charlie Hughes > Excelsior Audio > Gastonia, NC > +1 704.675.5435 (tel) > +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) > www.excelsior-audio.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SC-04-08 [mailto:sc-04-08-bounces at standards.aes.org] On Behalf Of AES Standards via SC-04-08 > Sent: Friday, 23 December, 2016 6:52 AM > To: sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org > Cc: AES Standards > Subject: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE > > Dear SC-04-08, > > I have received a liaison letter from SMPTE requesting comments on two draft documents following the earlier comments on B-chain measurement under project AES-X215. I have posted the letter and the draft documents to a folder called, "x215-161222-smpte-liaison-docs" in the SC-04-08 document site. > > The draft documents are: > > TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1-Baseline-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-1 Cinema Sound System Baseline Setup and Calibration " > > TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-2-Maintenance-Calibration-2016-12-02.pdf, "SMPTE RP 2096-2 Cinema Sound System Recurring/Maintenance Setup and Calibration" > > A direct login is available at: https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91 > > Please take a moment to download and consider these documents. Note that the covering letter requests comments by January 20th. > > Sincerely, > > > Mark Yonge > AES Standards Manager > > standards at aes.org > tel: +44 1594 517200 > skype: markyonge > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SC-04-08 mailing list > SC-04-08 at standards.aes.org > <http://standards.aes.org/sc.cfm?ID=91> > _______________________________________________ > SC-04-08 mailing list > SC-04-08 at standards.aes.org > <http://standards.aes.org/sc.cfm?ID=91> Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Next message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the SC-04-08 mailing list Expand 000345.html 12 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE pre { white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */ } [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö thomaslagoqirra at gmail.com Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Previous message: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Dear Charlie, Thanks for your comments. I would like to fill in a few comments too: 1. The FFT is dangerous when amplitude accuarcy is of interest. An FFT assumes stationary and narrowband signals (tonal) and then the scaling MUST be V^2. The correct Window must be used and the FFT must have the proper scaling (many analyzers don not have that and I am not kidding). If this is not handled properly it is possible to have very large amplitude errors. I have published multiple papers on the topic, if of interest. The text is way to weak to “force” users to do the right thing. (e.g. page 11). When changing from “tone” to “pink noise” the amplitude scaling MUST change if amplitude errors should be controlled! (should now be V^2/Hz and this must be mentioned) 2. Page 20 says "to ensure that data-windowing does not result in suppression of transient events.” The FFT is NOT able to handle transient events and have a proper amplitude accuracy and hence, this argument is not valid. The overlapping is used to minimize slowly varying changes in the data (statistical variations). If there are transient events in the data, these must be handled via Energy Spectral Density and not by Power Spectral Density! 3. Coherence is a number that should be in between 0-1, not -180 to 100 and in percent. (e..g page 19) 4. I would like to see the use of dBZ instead of “unweighted”. (e.g. page 31) I agree with your comments but would like to add my comments. Best regards, Dr. Thomas L. Lagö Chief Scientist & Chairman Cell Sweden: +46 708 357337 Cell USA: +1 479 571 0035 QirraSound Technologies Europe AB Slagetorp 2, 57692 Sävsjö, Sweden Manufacturing unit: QirraSound/VILAX, Tirupsvägen 9, 24593 Staffanstorp, Sweden thomas.lago at qirrasound.com <mailto:thomas.lago at qirrasound.com> www.qirrasound.se <http://www.qirrasound.se/> thomaslago.com <http://thomaslago.com/> This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, legally privileged, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering this to an addressee, you should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by reply e-mail, and destroy all copies of the original message. > On 29 Dec 2016, at 01:59, Charlie Hughes via SC-04-08 <sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org> wrote: > > The "Baseline" document with my comments has been uploaded to the SC-04-08 document site. The file name is "x215-TC25CSS-WD-RP-2096-1CH.pdf". > https://secure.aes.org/standards/documents/?ID=91&file=%2Fx215%2DTC25CSS%2DWD%2DRP%2D2096%2D1CH%2Epdf&filesize=5917704 > > In summary: > > Page 9 > Why are only mics with 1/4" diaphragms to be use? Aren't 1/2" mics suitable? > > > Page 11 > It seems that the FFT block size & the sample rate of an analyzer are thought to be the same thing. They are distinctly different > > > Pages 12, 13, & 31 > The use of "rd" or "th" immediately after a fraction (e.g. 1/3rd) is redundant and should be avoided. It would be equivalent to writing "one-thirdrd". > > > Page 20 > When setting the level of a test signal in comparison to the level of the background noise it is best to consider the frequency dependent nature of the noise and not just the broad band level of the noise. > > Why are only 1/2" mics mentioned for improved noise survey? One inch mics should perform better than 1/2" mics. > > > Page 21 > Using the word "preferred" when referencing NC might be confusing. Someone might think that the preferred noise criteria (PNC) is the metric to be used instead of the noise criteria (NC). > > Is setting all level controls to unity gain really what is intended? > > > Page 25 > Using the phase "opposite side of the scale" to describe a polarity difference seems to not be very rigorous. The setup of the display may not lend itself to have this phase carry much meaning. > > > Page 28 > Why is data allowed to be discarded because it doesn't match another measurement? > > Why is a 20 second average required? Is this due to potential S/N issues? > > > Page 31 > There is no Table 2.16.a > > The broad band SPL (both A-weighted & C-weighted) given in Table 1.13.a are a bit confusing. Are these supposed to be the summed SPL for the 1/3 octave center frequencies from 500 Hz to 2 kHz, inclusive, given an SPL of 71.5 dB in each band? If so, these values do not correlate with each other. > > > Best regards, > > Charlie Hughes > Excelsior Audio > Gastonia, NC > +1 704.675.5435 (tel) > +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) > www.excelsior-audio.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: AES Standards [mailto:standards at aes.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 28 December, 2016 6:16 AM > To: Charlie Hughes; Working group on Measurement and equalization of sound systems in rooms > Cc: AES Standards > Subject: Re: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE > > Charlie, > > Please post your comments to this reflector to allow discussion within this group. A summary can then be sent to SMPTE through our liaison arrangement. > > best regards, > > Mark > > >> On 2016-12-27, at 13:19, Charlie Hughes via SC-04-08 <sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> I have some comments on the "Baseline Calibration" document. I haven't yet reviewed the "Maintenance Calibration" document. >> >> Should my comments be submitted directly to SMPTE and Alan or should they go to AES first? Just want to know what the proper channel is for comment. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Charlie Hughes >> Excelsior Audio >> Gastonia, NC >> +1 704.675.5435 (tel) >> +1 704.678.6570 (mobile) >> www.excelsior-audio.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: SC-04-08 [mailto:sc-04-08-bounces at standards.aes.org] On Behalf Of AES Standards via SC-04-08 >> Sent: Friday, 23 December, 2016 6:52 AM >> To: sc-04-08 at standards.aes.org >> Cc: AES Standards >> Subject: [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE >> >> Dear SC-04-08, >> >> I have received a liaison letter from SMPTE requesting comments on two draft documents following the earlier comments on B-chain measurement under project AES-X215. I have posted the letter and the draft documents to a folder called, "x215-161222-smpte-liaiso... Expand This file was truncated for preview. Please download to view the full file. author-3.html 2 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link The SC-04-08 2016 Archive by author 2016 Archives by author Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ] More info on this list... Starting: Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Ending: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Messages: 5 [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards Last message date: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Archived on: Wed Dec 28 21:46:20 EST 2016 Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ] More info on this list... This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition). Expand date-3.html 2 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link The SC-04-08 2016 Archive by date 2016 Archives by date Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More info on this list... Starting: Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Ending: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Messages: 5 [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö Last message date: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Archived on: Wed Dec 28 21:46:20 EST 2016 Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More info on this list... This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition). Expand index-4.html 2 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link The SC-04-08 2016 Archive by thread 2016 Archives by thread Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... Starting: Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Ending: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Messages: 5 [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö Last message date: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Archived on: Wed Dec 28 21:46:20 EST 2016 Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition). Expand subject-3.html 2 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link The SC-04-08 2016 Archive by subject 2016 Archives by subject Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... Starting: Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Ending: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Messages: 5 [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö Last message date: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Archived on: Wed Dec 28 21:46:20 EST 2016 Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition). Expand thread-3.html 2 KB HTML - Click to view Options Copy Download Link The SC-04-08 2016 Archive by thread 2016 Archives by thread Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... Starting: Fri Dec 23 06:52:07 EST 2016 Ending: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Messages: 5 [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE AES Standards [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Charlie Hughes [SC-04-08] X215 liaison request from SMPTE Thomas Lagö Last message date: Wed Dec 28 21:46:12 EST 2016 Archived on: Wed Dec 28 21:46:20 EST 2016 Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] More info on this list... This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition). Expand 0 Comments Public All Members My Connections Only Me PublicAll MembersMy ConnectionsOnly Me Public All Members My Connections Only Me